This entry was posted on Saturday, April 27th, 2013 at 23:13 and is filed under Activists' Blogs, Activities, English. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
Saturday, April 27 2013
Umm al-‘Amad by David Shulman
Today we have the New Rules. In some respects they’re rather
like the Old Rules. The aim and sole rationale remain the same:
dispossession, expulsion, taking more land. The army has, it seems,
given up on its favorite device of declaring Closed Military Zones,
week after week; perhaps the outright illegality of this practice
ended up causing them too many problems in court. Instead, the
soldiers simply chase us—Palestinian shepherds, farmers, Israeli
activists—physically away, pushing, shoving, threatening, beating.
They also have decided they won’t allow us to document their crimes
on film; as soon as we start filming, they rush at us and block our
cameras with their cell phones. It’s as if they’d decided to circumvent
the whole irksome apparatus of the courts and to resort instead to
brute force. It’s much simpler, and maybe more effective.
At the same time, there’s been a wave of further annexations.
The settlers are paving new roads, which become de facto
boundaries, far beyond the settlements’ periphery. Plots of land that
the Palestinian owners have worked for some years, or have
reclaimed, often with our help, have been declared “in dispute”—
which means that settlers have access to them, but the rightful
owners don’t. All over South Hebron there are attempts from above
and from below to roll back the gains we’ve made in recent years.
Probably officers in the Civil Administration have been devising
creative schemes. And there have been the usual, routine detentions,
harassments, lethal threats, arrests—more, in fact much more, than
before. Add to this a wave of pure nit-picking and pestering, for
example by handing out tickets to activists, Israeli and Palestinian,
for absurd traffic violations; several of our people have recently been
fined large amounts for crossing the road while not on a marked
pedestrian crossing. Remember we’re talking about the vast open
spaces of a desert; the nearest pedestrian crossing is either in
Jerusalem or Beersheva, 40 miles away. I myself witnessed the police
administering just such a fine the last time I was in the area, some
three weeks back.
In short, things are tightening up. Here’s what it looks like on
an ordinary day. From Beit ‘Imrah we head down over the terraces to
the grazing grounds where the shepherds are clustered with their
sheep. An army jeep is waiting for us. A fat, balding officer heaves
himself out of it and informs Fadil: “You see this path. It’s the border.
You can’t cross it.” The path is an arbitrary line, deep inside the wadi
where, in the last months, they’ve been able to graze—after many
years during which this wadi was completely out of bounds. We start
filming. By now more soldiers, clutching rifles, have clambered out of
the jeep. They prod us, driving us over the line and then farther
uphill, and they’re jamming our cameras with their cell phones,
which they literally thrust in our faces. The commanding officer
doesn’t speak again. We protest, we talk of the law, we talk of the
crimes he’s committing. He doesn’t reply.
I have one of the cameras, so I get the cell phone procedure
over and over, as minutes become an hour, then maybe two hours. It
becomes a kind of game. He blocks me, I wave the camera up, down,
to the side, looping, looking for a crack or a window where I can film.
I manage quite a few short shots, enough, I hope, for the lawyers to
use. But he’s at me, pushing at me, taking joy, I think, in blocking and
parrying, without words, though I’m talking to him, asking him why
he’s so afraid of being filmed and telling him he’ll end up in the Court
of Justice at the Hague and so on and so on, and after a while it
becomes a dance, like nothing so much as the contact-point
improvisation that my wife Eileen has taught me: I take the camera
up to the far right, he brings his cell phone down on the lens, I weave
circles in the air and he follows me, loop for loop, I hold it down to
my waist, switch hands, wave it left or right, over my head, behind
my back, and he follows every move in the morose silence his role
demands. In the broiling dust of late morning, we move, gyrate, twirl
together over rock and thorn.
But it’s not much fun as a game. Today there’s a new tone,
menacing and malicious. I think again about wickedness. Since I
encounter it so regularly, I’ve developed the rudiments of a theory. I
tend to bracket out the pure sadists, who are anyway rather rare, and
to focus on those soldiers and policemen who seem to me capable of
feeling uneasy or conflicted in the reality in which they are following
their orders. For them, I think, like for most of us, the decision is
often a subtle one. But today it’s different. The ranking officer and
one lower officer are into it. Their faces give them away: cruel, hard-
set, disdainful, fully committed to this course. This isn’t cruelty for its
own sake, for the sheer pornographic delight it can provide—I’ve
occasionally seen that in South Hebron– but something arguably
worse, and in no way aberrant. They believe in the necessity of
causing hurt, and they do it without hesitation, driving their
subordinate soldiers, who are far more innocent and, perhaps,
ambivalent, along with them. “An intellectual hatred is the worst,” as
Yeats says. But theirs is not only intellectual.
How they rationalize it may not much matter. Later, after a
long morning of this chase-and-torment, one of the reserve soldiers
tells us: “We have proof that you people pay these Palestinians to
provoke us.” That, I suppose, is how he lives with himself. We’re the
problem. And in a way it’s true—if we hadn’t been here over months
and years, all the lands in the wadi and along the slopes would have
been lost forever, as the settlers wanted. We brought the shepherds
back. Now they’re here on their lands, and these soldiers are here to
cram them back into the little pockets and enclaves they inhabited
before. After a while one of the soldiers begins to scream curses,
sharp and thin in the desert air. “You Ruiners of Israel, ochrai yisrael,
you are aiding the enemies of the Jews, degenerates”—he is waving
his gun, threatening us, fingering the clip. [See http:// www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4372971,00.html and http:// www.ynet.co.il/articles/0,7340,L-4372939,00.html (Hebrew)]
The only thing missing in the whole mad scene is a bona fide
madman, and indeed he turns up on cue. He’s from Yata, and his
sister lives in Beit ‘Imrah. He’s wearing a thick blue jacket, too hot for
today, and the shepherds tell us at once that he’s crazy. He picks up
rocks—there’s no dearth of them—and lobs a few at the sheep. He
refuses to go away. All we need now is for him to throw a rock at the
soldiers, and god knows what will happen. He weaves his way up and
down the hill, in and out of the herd, cursing the young boys who are
tending the sheep, chanting unintelligible mantras, his eyes bulging,
jagged stones cradled in his palms. The shepherds taunt him; he gets
more and more angry and voluble. I think he fits right in. “Let him
be,” says the fat officer, “hu akhla gever, he’s a fine guy.”
— The shepherds are impressive; cool, unintimidated. ‘Abd, in
an elegant black shirt, tells me he’s in 10th grade, studying math,
physics, Arabic, English. Grades one to ten are all packed together in
a single kuttab classroom. After two more years, he wants to study
engineering in Hebron or Ramallah or Nablus. He asks me what I do,
and I tell him. He likes Indian films and has actually picked up a little
Hindi, so for a few minutes, in the midst of everything else, the sheep,
soldiers, shepherds, lunatic, all playing their parts to perfection, we
chatter in Hindi and Arabic. He’s smart, quick to learn. He needs a
computer, and then maybe through his cell phone he could pick up
the internet even out here, in Beit ‘Imrah, strange as that must sound.
— As we’re getting ready to leave—the sheep have eaten their fill of
thorns—my friend Anas turns up. The last times I was here we had
long theological discussions, which included the troubling question
of whether turtles can get into Paradise (the answer is yes, in case
you’ve forgotten). He says he’s missed seeing me. He’s interested in
the little book I am carrying in my front pocket, so I hand it to him,
and he flips through the pages. Most of it is in Greek: I tell him there
was once, long ago, a great poet called Homer. He hasn’t heard of
Homer. On the cover it says: Iliad XXI. He examines it closely and
says: “It means Iliad, whoever he is, extra extra large.”
Beneath the bonhomie there is trauma. Anas, 16 years old, was
arrested some weeks ago by the Border Police, who took the trouble
to hit him with various trumped-up charges. By great good fortune
we had video footage that clearly showed the Border Police were
lying, but still they held Anas for thirty hours, hand-cuffed, stripped
bare, outside in the freezing cold, with no food or water. They
wouldn’t let him go to the bathroom. They told him they were going
to hold him for twelve months without trial. Finally he saw a judge,
who freed him without conditions. But Anas has changed since I last
saw him. He has bad dreams at night; they are coming to kill him.
— On the way back to Jerusalem, Gabi asks me if I still think there’s
some possibility for the two-state solution. I shake my head. Guy,
who’s in South Hebron all the time, says, “Yes, of course, that’s what
Israel wants. They want the Jewish state here, on the ground, all of
it, and the Palestinian state can be somewhere else, maybe on the
moon.”
— I come back disheartened and weary—exactly what our enemies
hope to achieve. Many hours in the thirsty sun, climbing up and down
those hills, are nothing compared to the mild agony of dealing with
those soldiers. Today’s motto, from Staretz Silouan, the nineteenth-
century mystic, quoted by the incomparable Gillian Rose: “Keep your
mind in hell, and despair not.”
Pressing Issues